Home
>
invinsense
>
Invinsense oxdr
Invinsense OXDR · UEMP

See all exposures. Prove what's real. Fix what matters.

As AI speeds up exploitation, Invinsense Unified Exposure Management Platform (UEMP) brings exposure assessment and adversarial exposure validation into one platform, so your teams stop chasing scanner noise and close the exposures attackers can actually reach, before they do.

Book a Demo
Representative Vendor, 2026 Gartner® Market Guide for Adversarial Exposure ValidationInfopercept is recognized across multiple Gartner® reports spanning exposure management, preemptive security and security validation.
Scanner output Invinsense UEMP
Every finding looks urgentCritical High Medium
Twelve are proven exploitableValidated Prioritized Deprioritized

Drag the slider. Illustrative data.

Invinsense OXDR is now Invinsense UEMP. The same offensive security DNA, now supercharged for AI-native exposure management. Continuous exposure assessment (EAP) meets adversarial exposure validation (AEV) in one dynamic, automated cycle.
Read Technical Brief
See Gartner® Recognition →

Attackers have AI now. Your exposure program needs it too.

CISOs are facing a new reality: faster AI means faster exploits and an unprecedented volume of novel vulnerabilities. Manual scan-and-patch routines can't scale. It's time to shift to an automated, AI-native exposure program, which is built for continuous discovery, validation and remediation.

The exposure window: AI pulls exploit availability closer to disclosure while patch cycles stay long. UEMP answers before the exploit arrives. Before AI-assisted exploitation Patch cycle (weeks) Exploit Now Exploit arrives early Exposed and exploitable With Invinsense UEMP Matched, validated, mitigated Disclosure
Conceptual. Not to scale.

Exploits arrive faster

AI helps attackers turn a fresh disclosure into a working exploit far sooner, while most patch cycles still run in weeks. The gap between the two is where breaches happen.

Gartner cites the shrinking time between disclosure and active exploitation as a key reason organizations adopt automated validation.

More vulnerabilities, and new kinds

AI-assisted coding ships more code, faster. Models, AI agents and their components add attack surface most inventories don't track yet, on top of cloud and third-party sprawl.

The never-ending patch-and-pray CVE battle

Severity scores mark far too much as high risk, and manual pentests happen too rarely to separate real exposure from noise. Security teams end up patching by CVSS and hoping it’s enough.

Gartner identifies skill and complexity barriers as the reason offensive testing often falls short.

The Invinsense UEMP difference

Invinsense UEMP employs advanced AI to map your environment across on-prem and cloud, uncovering hidden gaps and visualizing exact attack paths. By correlating reachability with exploitability, it relies on evidence - not just risk scores - to isolate true exposures and eliminate alert fatigue. Finally, Invinsense UEMP delivers tailored, practical (compensating controls) and disruption-free remediation guidance - beyond ordinary patching - to secure your environments without operational downtime.

OXDR

Evidence, not scores

Reachability, attack paths and business context shrink thousands of findings to the few that matter.

See the four lenses

Answers in hours

New advisories matched to live inventory the day they break, with coverage gaps flagged.

Follow a zero-day

Validation at machine speed

Governed AI agents chain and prove real attack paths, under rules your CISO signs off.

Meet the agents

Fixes that fit

Misconfigs reverted to baseline, vulns fixed with context: patch, workaround, compensating control or VEX.

See how fixes work

Two halves of exposure management, finally in one place

Gartner distinguishes Exposure Assessment Platforms (EAP), which find and prioritize exposures, from Adversarial Exposure Validation (AEV), which proves whether they can be exploited. It describes the two working as a closed loop. Invinsense UEMP runs that loop in one platform, on one asset record.

Exposure Assessment Platform (EAP)

What is exposed, and how much does it matter?

Produces
Continuously discovered exposures across every asset, scored with threat and business context.
On its own
It can predict how likely exploitation is, but it can't prove an exposure is exploitable against your actual controls.
EASMVendor WatchCSPMASPMBOM RegistryRBVM

Adversarial Exposure Validation (AEV)

Can an attacker actually use it?

Produces
Evidence of attack feasibility, confirmed exposures, and fixes verified by retest.
On its own
Without a complete, prioritized inventory, testing effort goes to the wrong targets or misses new ones.
PTaaSZero-Day War Room

Invinsense UEMP

What should we fix first, and did the fix work?

Produces
One risk-ranked queue of confirmed exposures, tracked against SLAs and retested to closure.
Why it's different
No hand-off between tools. The same asset record carries a finding from discovery through validation to a verified fix, and validation results push priority back into assessment.
Shared asset inventoryEPSS, KEV, SSVC scoringBusiness contextAI assistance

One platform, one continuous cycle

Attack-surface inputs feed exposure assessment. Prioritized exposures move to validation. Validated, risk-ranked outcomes come out the other side, all on a shared foundation of inventory, scoring and business context.

Infopercept Invinsense Unified Exposure Management Platform Attack-surface inputs feed Exposure Assessment (EASM, Vendor Watch, CSPM, ASPM, BOM Registry, RBVM), which hands prioritized exposures to Adversarial Exposure Validation (PTaaS, Zero-Day War Room) across a continuous CTEM cycle on a shared foundation, producing validated, risk-ranked outcomes. Unified Exposure Management Platform Assess what is exposed, prove what is exploitable, and fix what matters, in one continuous cycle. Gartner® Market Guide for Adversarial Exposure Validation, 2026 Infopercept named a Representative Vendor Invinsense UEMP 01 Scope 02 Discover 03 Prioritize 04 Validate 05 Mobilize EAP AEV Attack surface Outcomes Internet footprint Domains, IPs, open services Cloud estates AWS, Azure, GCP, K8s, M365 Code and pipelines GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, ADO Scanners and test tools Nessus, Acunetix, Nuclei, Trivy Third parties and VIPs Vendors, subsidiaries, executives Threat advisories NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS Exposure Assessment EASM Internet-facing assets, discovered continuously Vendor Watch Outside-in risk for vendors, subsidiaries, VIPs CSPM Posture and compliance across multi-cloud ASPM Code, secrets, dependencies, containers, IaC BOM Registry SBOM, CBOM and AI-BOM in one inventory RBVM Scored by exploitability and business impact Adversarial Exposure Validation PTaaS Pentest engagements governed from scope to retest, reopen or risk acceptance Zero-Day War Room New advisories matched to live inventory, ranked and run as response campaigns Validation signals across the platform CVE verification Service validation Attack-path analysis Retest and reopen Advisory matching Leadership proof packs Risk-ranked remediation One queue, ordered by real risk Confirmed exposure Evidence, not raw scanner findings Zero-day answers in hours Advisories matched to inventory Verified fixes Retested, closed and on record Board-level reporting Risk in business and financial terms Shared foundation Asset inventory One record per asset Risk scoring EPSS, KEV, SSVC Business context Criticality, $ risk, SLA AI assistance Fixes and reports Gartner, Market Guide for Adversarial Exposure Validation, D. Poole, M. Schneider, E. Ahlm, 24 March 2026. GARTNER is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications.

Scroll sideways to see the full diagram.

How Invinsense UEMP cuts thousands of findings to a handful

Raw scanner output treats every finding as equal. Invinsense UEMP applies four lenses in turn, each one removing exposures that can't actually be reached or exploited. Pick a lens to watch it work.

InternetedgeExposed APIreachableInternal libnot reachableCVE-AcriticalCVE-BcriticalFix this oneSkip: no path reaches it

Invinsense UEMP maps your topology and analyzes the exact conditions required for an exploit, then uses read-only network and runtime context to verify if the path is actually reachable.

Because a "critical" vulnerability on inaccessible code isn't an emergency - it's just noise.

ASPMEASMRBVM
Powered by Regiment AI · Early access

Validation at machine speed, under your rules of engagement

Attackers run AI that discovers and exploits without asking permission. Infopercept's answer is Regiment AI: the same force multiplier, bounded by scope, confidence gates and human approval, feeding validated attack paths straight into the Invinsense UEMP queue.

Invinsense Regiment AI logo

Autonomous offense, ungoverned

Finds real exploit paths at machine speed, but roams free. Nothing a CISO can scope, pause or put on the record.

Regiment AI offense

Same creative force, plus business context, policy boundaries, confidence gates and a closed loop into defense and governance. It operates under orders.

Scoped authority

Agents probe only declared assets, actions and data. Nothing reachable outside the order of battle.

Dual approval

Offensive and high-risk steps need sign-off from two authorized humans before they run.

Kill switch, always live

Any authorized human can halt an agent mid-execution, instantly.

Immutable record

Every decision, approval and outcome is written to an audit log that can be reviewed, never edited.

Validated finding

Proof, not a maybe

Every path arrives with its exploit chain, business impact and full decision trace, ready for remediation and audit.

Into the queue

Priority that reflects reality

Confirmed exploitability pushes an exposure up the RBVM queue and raises its asset's risk, automatically.

Closed loop

Shapes defense next time

A real attack path becomes a detection and prioritization signal, so the same route is caught faster in future.

Explore Regiment AI

Remediation that fixes the cause, not just the ticket

Finding exposure is half the job. Invinsense UEMP closes it with context: misconfigurations reverted to an approved baseline, and vulnerabilities fixed the way that actually fits your environment, not just "apply patch."

One vulnerability, the right fix

A patch isn't always available or safe to deploy. Invinsense UEMP weighs reachability, exploitability and business impact, then recommends the path that closes real risk fastest. Step through a finding.

Critical CVEPatch available?Reachable?Control + virtual patching Pause
Finding: critical CVE in a web dependencyStart at the top. Invinsense UEMP asks a series of questions before recommending anything.

Context-led vulnerability fixes

  • Targeted patchAutomated fix opened as a pull or merge request for developer review (ASPM).
  • AI workaround guidanceA practical mitigation when no patch exists yet (ASPM, Regiment AI).
  • Compensating controlNetwork or config control that removes reachability without touching the asset.
  • VEX statementDocumented "not exploitable" when a dependency isn't reachable, so the team stops chasing it (ASPM).
  • Governed risk acceptanceAn auditable, revocable record when a fix has to wait (RBVM).

Misconfiguration remediation

  • Cloud posture driftMulti-cloud misconfigurations surfaced with remediation guidance and mapped to CIS, PCI DSS and HIPAA (CSPM).
  • Revert to baselineRisky code and config changes rolled back to the approved state, every fix scoped, logged and reversible (Regiment AI, Remedy Y).
  • Merge-request gatesNew misconfigurations blocked before they reach production (ASPM).
  • CIS benchmarkingConfigurations checked against hardening baselines across the estate.

Eight modules, each built for one job

Filter by layer or by the Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) stage you're working on. Open any module for its full capability set.

Book a Demo
Book a Demo
Iconarrow

CTEM falls apart in the handoffs. Invinsense UEMP closes the loop.

Select a stage to see how Invinsense UEMP's integrated modules drive the CTEM cycle from discovery to verified remediation.

01Scope02Discover03Prioritize04Validate05MobilizeCTEMcontinuous cycle

Stage 1 of 5

Scope

Decide what matters before you scan anything: business units, crown-jewel assets, cloud accounts, code repositories and the third parties you depend on. PTaaS engagements carry asset-linked scope, and BOM Registry shows exactly what your estate contains.

EASMVendor WatchCSPMASPMBOM RegistryRBVMPTaaSZero-Day War Room

From advisory to verified fix, in one flow

Follow a new critical CVE through the platform. Scrub the timeline to watch an 80-asset estate narrow from "are we affected?" to "fixed and proven."

Not affected Runs the component Coverage gap Proven exploitable Fixed and retested
Drag to move through the response, stage by stage
AdvisoryMatchRankValidateMobilizeClose

Hour 0

A critical advisory lands

Zero-Day War Room ingests the new CVE from NVD and pulls in CISA KEV and EPSS signals. The question everyone asks: are we affected?

80assets in scope, status unknown

Zero-Day War Room

Illustrative scenario. Times and counts vary by environment.

What changes when assessment and validation share one platform

The outcomes your board, your SOC and your developers each care about, from the same source of truth.

Risk-ranked remediation

One queue, ordered by exploitability, exposure and business impact instead of raw severity.

RBVM

Confirmed exposure

Evidence-backed findings, with false positives filtered out before they reach a remediation team.

EASM, ASPM

Zero-day answers in hours

New advisories matched to live inventory, ranked, and run as owned response campaigns.

Zero-Day War Room

Verified fixes

Findings retested, reopened if needed, and closed on record, with formal risk acceptance where a fix isn't possible.

PTaaS

Board-level reporting

Exposure expressed in business and financial terms, with leadership-ready proof packs.

RBVM, Zero-Day War Room

A platform, plus people who attack for a living

Gartner suggests that organizations short on in-house testing skills consume validation through a PTaaS model. Invinsense UEMP is backed by Infopercept's own offensive security team, so you get the technology and the people to run it.

Offensive security services

  • Penetration testing: web, mobile and cloud
  • Vulnerability assessment
  • Red teaming and breach and attack simulation
  • Phishing, vishing and smishing simulation
  • SBOM and software risk assessment
  • CIS benchmarking for configurations

The team behind it

  • Red team strategists
  • Adversary emulation specialists
  • Penetration testers and exploit developers
  • DevSecOps experts
  • Social engineers
  • Threat intelligence analysts

Where the market is heading

Gartner's 2026 Market Guide for Adversarial Exposure Validation points to validation becoming a standard part of exposure management.

Validation becomes a structured practice

Gartner predicts that by 2029, 60% of organizations will run a structured exposure validation practice within CTEM, enabled mainly by AEV technology and managed service providers.

Validated results drive remediation automatically

Gartner also expects 30% of organizations to connect AEV results to automated remediation or orchestration workflows by 2029.

Validation closes the loop on assessment

Gartner describes AEV confirming exposures found by assessment platforms, raising their priority, triggering fixes and retesting until the exposure is no longer exploitable.

Gartner, Market Guide for Adversarial Exposure Validation, Dhivya Poole, Mitchell Schneider, Eric Ahlm, 24 March 2026. GARTNER is a registered trademark and service mark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the U.S. and internationally and is used herein with permission. All rights reserved. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner's research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

See your own exposure the way an attacker would

Talk to an Infopercept expert about bringing assessment, validation and remediation into one program, across IT, cloud, OT and IoT.
Book a Demo
Right Arrow
AWS Marketplace
Live Demo
Platform Tour
Request a Personal Workshop
Let's Talk!
Sign up for Infopercept news
No spam, only the news you can use from Infopercept technology updates and events.
success icon
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Invinsense
Invinsense PlatformInvinsense MeshInvinsense ISOCInvinsense ISOC ExtensionInvinsense OXDRInvinsense GSOSInvinsense MDRInvinsense OTInvinsense Cloud SecurityInvinsense for CTEMInvinsense OCSF AI ConverterInvinsense LLM AI Gateway
Services
SOCTech OptimizationCompliance HubWeb App PentestVAPTMobile App PentestSBOM and Software Risk AssessmentPhishing and Vishing AssessmentCloud PentestDFIRRed Teaming and BAS
Company
Company OverviewInvinsense LegacyIn the NewsManagement TeamCareers
Contact Us
Address & InquiryBecome a Partner
Popular Links
SolutionsBlog
Resources
Scope Definition FormsSample ReportsTechnical ApproachKnowledge LettersCase StudiesVideosPress ReleasesResourcesWhitepapersDatasheets
Infopercept
Copyright © 2026 Infopercept. All rights reserved.
Follow Us